Bug 1852549
Summary: | blis: no support for 64-bit builds on s390x | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Iñaki Ucar <i.ucar86> |
Component: | blis | Assignee: | Dave Love <dave.love> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dave.love |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | s390x | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-07-01 11:14:15 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Iñaki Ucar
2020-06-30 16:53:39 UTC
Thanks. It should be fixed in rawhide, but I'll have to go back to it for f32. In case you're a z-series expert, I could probably improve it a bit with information about micro-arch features; I did have a look a while ago, and couldn't immediately find enough. Unfortunately, I'm no z-series expert. :) I just stumbled upon this issue because I was packaging FlexiBLAS, which wraps several BLAS/LAPACK backends, and this one wasn't detected for that platform. As it turns out, bli_info_get_int_type_size() was returning 32. :) This isn't the place for a discussion, but I don't think packaging flexiblas would be helpful. It doesn't solve any real problem as far as I can tell, and will cause more trouble. IMO, it solves two problems at once, and I don't see what trouble it may cause. Please, read the change proposal and follow the associated discussion in the devel mailing list: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlexiBLAS_as_BLAS/LAPACK_manager. All the feedback we can gather would be helpful to reach a conclusion. |