Bug 1852577
| Summary: | "dnf history list" displays an erratic output | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rubén <rlledo> | ||||||
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | Nicola Sella <nsella> | ||||||
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||
| Version: | 32 | CC: | btanastasov, dmach, ggr.seaton, jmracek, jrohel, kparal, mblaha, mhatina, nsella, packaging-team-maint, pkratoch, rpm-software-management, vmukhame | ||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | dnf-4.6.1-1.fc33 dnf-4.6.1-1.fc34 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2021-03-05 19:16:47 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
Created attachment 1699377 [details]
Wrong output
dnf PR: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1636 test: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/902 *** Bug 1862007 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** *** Bug 1888216 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** This is also an issue in RHEL8. Any need to raise a separate bug report? Yes please, it's a different distro, having a separate bug report from a user would be great. (we try not to file the bugs by ourselves because it hides the requester and breaks the feedback loop) These pr address the issue https://github.com/rpm-software-management/dnf/pull/1636 https://github.com/rpm-software-management/ci-dnf-stack/pull/902 FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. FEDORA-2021-4d7356a470 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2021-4bef57b401 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. FEDORA-2021-530abc3f9a has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. I can confirm that `sudo dnf history | less` (or head) no longer breaks the output. dnf-4.6.1-1.fc33.noarch Hello. Fixed. Thank you very much. Regards. |
Created attachment 1699376 [details] Expected result Description of problem: "dnf history list" displays an erractic output when piped through any other command, for example, "more" or "head": $ dnf history list | head $ dnf history list | more Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): dnf-4.2.23 How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: Type in a shell: $ dnf history list | head $ dnf history list | more Actual results: (see attached screenshot) Expected results: (see attached screenshot) Additional info: