Bug 185359
Summary: | Review Request: kchm - CHM file viewer | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | John Mahowald <jpmahowald> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | rdieter |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-07-22 19:05:56 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Patrice Dumas
2006-03-13 22:55:23 UTC
Thanks to Rex and Jochen for helping me packaging it. Jochen has allready pointed out that there is a deficiency: - - Mime binding doesn't work. I don't know what it means, but here it is ;-) I think I fixed the mime handling in the updated version: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/kchm-0.6.5-2.src.rpm Not building. Cannot find build req libchmxx-devel What package is supposed to provide that? I assume the .la libtool files are necessary. I forgot to push the builds for all the branches after libchmxx was accepted... It is done now, so it should build. The .la are necessary for kde. kchmviewer is in extras allready, kchm doesn't seems to be very active, and has trouble with accented entity characters in indices, nobody seems really interested in it, maybe it is not worth pursuing the effort to include it in fedora extras? I am not that interrested anymore to maintain it, given that kchmviewer seems superior. It seems to me that the cost of maintaining it would overcome largely the benefits. I propose to close the request. Anybody really wanting kchm? I agree that with duplicate functionality already in Extras we can hold of on this. Closing. |