Bug 185417

Summary: Review Request: DoulosSIL-fonts
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael A. Peters <mpeters>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Thorsten Leemhuis (ignored mailbox) <bugzilla-sink>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-14 18:40:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michael A. Peters 2006-03-14 16:57:18 UTC 
Spec Name or Url: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/DoulosSIL-fonts.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://mpeters.us/fc_extras/DoulosSIL-fonts-4.0.14.r1-1.fc4.src.rpm

Description:
The goal for this product was to provide a single Unicode-based font family
that would contain a comprehensive inventory of glyphs needed for almost any
Roman- or Cyrillic-based writing system, whether used for phonetic or
orthographic needs. In addition, there is provision for other characters and
symbols useful to linguists. This font makes use of state-of-the-art font
technologies to support complex typographic issues, such as the need to
position arbitrary combinations of base glyphs and diacritics optimally.

Doulos is very similar to Times/Times New Roman, but only has a single face -
regular. It is intended for use alongside other Times-like fonts where a range
of styles (italic, bold) are not needed.

-=-=-=-=-
NOTES

rpmlint will complain about license.
gentium-fonts is a package already in Extras with the same license
rpmlint will complain about EOL of the pdf in documentation.
There probably should be a filter for pdf files in rpmlint - the pdf views fine in evince/acroread/etc - fixing the eol (at least with sed) would break the pdf.
Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-03-14 17:54:39 UTC 
How does this package differ from the doulos-fonts package which is already in
Extras?  It looks to be the same thing.
Comment 2 Michael A. Peters 2006-03-14 18:40:05 UTC 
It's not.
I must have mis-spelled it with the search.