Bug 1854173

Summary:	Service template create API unable to create RHEV service_template
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Tina Fitzgerald <tfitzger>
Component:	Automate	Assignee:	drew uhlmann <duhlmann>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Sudhir Mallamprabhakara <smallamp>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:	Red Hat CloudForms Documentation <cloudforms-docs>
Priority:	medium
Version:	5.11.5	CC:	dmetzger, obarenbo, simaishi
Target Milestone:	GA
Target Release:	5.11.8
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-08-19 15:02:11 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Comment 2 drew uhlmann 2020-07-06 16:13:22 UTC

I marked comment 1 as private cause it's got a rh-specific address in the call. 

This's the public info from that comment: 

Unable to create RHEV specific service_template through the API.

5.11.5

How reproducible:
always


And as a note, in order to use that api call in comment 1, you will have to adjust ids/hostnames because they're system-specific.

Comment 3 drew uhlmann 2020-07-06 16:15:40 UTC

The PR to fix this is here: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/20319 
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-api/pull/860 should also be counted as a PR that, while it won't fix this and is not intended to do so, will clarify the error. 

Per that PR, here are the errors associated with this ticket. 
Could not create Service Template - Service Model not found and
Could not create Service Template - Unable to launch Automate Method because currently in SQL transaction

Comment 4 drew uhlmann 2020-07-06 16:18:49 UTC

Additional info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672358
https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-api/issues/823

Comment 5 Satoe Imaishi 2020-08-19 15:02:11 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1672358 ***