Bug 185429
Summary: | "Stray" processes after a bootup | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Michal Jaegermann <michal> |
Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Peter Jones <pjones> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-11 02:17:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Michal Jaegermann
2006-03-14 19:12:11 UTC
One, rather unclean, way to deal with that would be to put 'pkill nash' somwhere in startup scripts after file systems got mounted (it is /usr/bin/pkill or use /bin/kill with /sbin/pidof but then an output of pidof needs to be checked). Otherwise we are still mapping deleted executables. Try 'cat /proc/$(pgrep nash)/maps' to see. What version of initscripts do you have installed? They should be doing: killall nash-hotplug >/dev/null 2>&1 just before starting udev, and that should kill this process. (nash-hotplug is the name, but ps displays argv[] rather than the actual process name) > What version of initscripts do you have installed? initscripts-8.31-1. This is the current version available. > They should be doing ... Well, yes, they do on line 168 of /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit but clearly this is not terminating that process. Maybe timing? Oh, I see. 'killall' is /usr/bin/killall and /usr is mounted later. If you want that at this point then you need something like nashpid=$(/sbin/pidof nash); [ "$nashpid" ] && /bin/kill $nashpid This works. 'pidof nash-hotplug' is empty. Otherwise that killall can be used further down. So this looks like initscripts problem. This bug is still present in FC5 with all updates available 2006-05-08 Fedora Core 5 is no longer maintained. Is this bug still present in Fedora 7 or Fedora 8? > Is this bug still present in Fedora 7 or Fedora 8?
Hm, let's have a look (which surely you could do equally well
yourself). Tap, tap, tap .... No, apparently not. At least
in an updated Fedora 7 because, IIRC, it was still present just
after a 7 release - although I would not swear that at this moment.
|