Bug 185448

Summary: policygentool seems to be broken
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Thorsten Scherf <tscherf>
Component: selinux-policyAssignee: Daniel Walsh <dwalsh>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: FC5 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-05-09 19:24:47 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Thorsten Scherf 2006-03-14 21:30:04 UTC
Description of problem:
when generating a foo.pp file with policygentool, answering the questions seems
to break the pp-file when calling the Makefile:
[root@tiffy devel]# make -f Makefile
Compliling targeted httpd module
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  loading policy configuration from tmp/httpd.tmp
httpd.te:42:ERROR 'syntax error' at token 'init_use_fd' on line 43202:
init_use_fd(httpd_t)
# Init script handling
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  error(s) encountered while parsing configuration
make: *** [tmp/httpd.mod] Fehler 1

when not answering the questions, it's working:
[root@tiffy devel]# make -f Makefile
Compliling targeted httpd module
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  loading policy configuration from tmp/httpd.tmp
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  policy configuration loaded
/usr/bin/checkmodule:  writing binary representation (version 5) to tmp/httpd.mod
Creating targeted httpd.pp policy package
rm tmp/httpd.mod.fc tmp/httpd.mod





Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
selinux-policy-2.2.23-15

How reproducible:
./policygentool foo /usr/sbin/foo
answer all questions for log files, init-scripts, ...



Steps to Reproduce:
1../policygentool foo /usr/sbin/foo
2.answer all questions for log files, init-scripts, ...
3.make -f Makefile (in /usr/share/selinux/devel/)
  
Actual results:
pp-file isn't created.

Expected results:
a working pp-file which could be loaded with "semodule -i foo.pp"

Additional info: