Bug 1857518

Summary: Upgrade Mono from 4.6 to 6.8 in Epel7
Product: [Fedora] Fedora EPEL Reporter: Timotheus Pokorra <mailinglists>
Component: monoAssignee: Timotheus Pokorra <mailinglists>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: epel7CC: chkr, itamar, john.j5live, lxtnow, quent.haas, rhughes, rstrode, sandmann
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: mono-6.8.0-1.el7 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-05 02:01:13 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Timotheus Pokorra 2020-07-16 04:10:51 UTC
Mono 4.6 is quite old nowadays.

Epel8 has Mono 6.6.

We need to test if packages depending on Mono need a rebuild.

Comment 1 Timotheus Pokorra 2020-07-16 04:15:07 UTC
Or should we go straight to Mono 6.8, since that is delivered in Ubuntu Focal LTS? https://packages.ubuntu.com/de/focal/mono-complete

Comment 2 Timotheus Pokorra 2020-07-18 04:17:12 UTC
lets go straight for Mono 6.8

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2020-07-18 06:26:39 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e90aa6c3ac has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e90aa6c3ac

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2020-07-19 02:05:53 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e90aa6c3ac has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e90aa6c3ac

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-08-05 02:01:13 UTC
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-e90aa6c3ac has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 6 Quentin Haas 2020-08-17 12:54:51 UTC
Many thanks!  I see that even ppc64le got the packages.  This will save me quite a bit of time.