Bug 1858209

Summary:	bad symbolic link in virtio-win-0.1.171-1.noarch
Product:	[Community] Virtualization Tools	Reporter:	Jean-Benoit Tristant <jeanbenoit>
Component:	virtio-win	Assignee:	Amnon Ilan <ailan>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Virtualization Bugs <virt-bugs>
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	unspecified	CC:	crobinso, ghammer, haoliu, jinzhao, juzhang, lijin, virt-maint, vrozenfe, yvugenfi
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-07-17 13:02:02 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jean-Benoit Tristant 2020-07-17 08:33:59 UTC

Description of problem:
Bad symbolic link in package virtio-win-0.1.171-1.noarch
$ ls -l /usr/share/virtio-win/
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 2,9M 20 mai  2019 virtio-win-0.1.171_servers_x86.vfd
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root   35 20 mai  2019 virtio-win_servers_x86.vfd -> virtio-win-0.1.171_servers__x86.vfd

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Virtio-win 0.1.171-1

Underscores in the name.

Actual results:
virtio-win_servers_x86.vfd -> virtio-win-0.1.171_servers__x86.vfd

Expected results:
irtio-win_servers_x86.vfd -> virtio-win-0.1.171_servers_x86.vfd

Comment 1 Cole Robinson 2020-07-17 13:02:02 UTC

This was fixed in virtio-win > 171: https://github.com/crobinso/virtio-win-pkg-scripts/commit/b17cae2b2d65d71df177c2712b43c7ae8b13a93a

Comment 2 Cole Robinson 2020-07-17 13:03:24 UTC

I see 171 is still what's listed the in 'stable' upstream repo. We need to bump those versions

vadim what are other good releases to put there? what versions did with we ship with 8.1 and 8.2?

Comment 3 Vadim Rozenfeld 2020-07-17 23:56:18 UTC

(In reply to Cole Robinson from comment #2)
> I see 171 is still what's listed the in 'stable' upstream repo. We need to
> bump those versions
> 
> vadim what are other good releases to put there? what versions did with we
> ship with 8.1 and 8.2?

I'm going to push build 185 (which was the base for 8.2.1) as the the new stable 
one shortly. Just need a couple of days or so for doing that.