Bug 185826

Summary: Minus sign not showing in OO equations
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Sammy <umar>
Component: openoffice.orgAssignee: Caolan McNamara <caolanm>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: ma, phoenix49
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 2.0.2-5.7.2 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-04-04 07:30:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Sammy 2006-03-18 21:59:24 UTC
Description of problem:

With the latest OO package none of the "-" signs show in my equations.
There is a box character instead.

The opens___.ttf font is placed under 

/usr/lib/openoffice.org2.0/share/fonts/truetype

which is not cached by fc-cache. Could it be the problem?
Thanks


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

openoffice.org-base-2.0.2-5.2.2

How reproducible:

always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. type an equation containing a - sign
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 1 Sammy 2006-03-18 22:03:45 UTC
No...I copied the ttt font to old location and cached it with fc-cache,
restarted, and still no minus sign. If I replace - with "-" it shows it
but a short ugly minus instead of the nice math minus.

Comment 2 Sammy 2006-03-19 15:41:22 UTC
If you use the latest opens___.ttf font from the bug number mentioned in the
spec file the problem is solved!
FYI

Comment 3 Caolan McNamara 2006-03-20 10:27:05 UTC
Yeah, this opens___.ttf file is a source of much fighting in the last few years,
and we're close to a shared solution. The right one is in cvs, but needs to be
pushed out to the world :-(

Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2006-03-28 18:32:57 UTC
*** Bug 187128 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 5 Caolan McNamara 2006-04-03 08:22:06 UTC
*** Bug 187672 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***