Bug 1858884
| Summary: | [cephadm] rgw daemons are not coming up with the documented commands | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao> |
| Component: | Cephadm | Assignee: | Juan Miguel Olmo <jolmomar> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Vasishta <vashastr> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | Karen Norteman <knortema> |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 5.0 | CC: | pnataraj, sewagner, tserlin, twilkins, vereddy |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 5.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ceph-16.0.0-7209.el8cp | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-08-30 08:26:28 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Vikhyat Umrao
2020-07-20 16:47:55 UTC
Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity. Looks like we do have an upstream report - https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/46385. @Vikhyat Umrao: In all the command you have put the values needed to use your hosts except in: # ceph orch apply rgw myorg us-east-1 --placement="2 myhost1 myhost2" Why did you use "myhost1 myhost2" ? instead of: # ceph orch apply rgw myorg us-east-1 --placement="3 dell-per630-13.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com dell-per630-12.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com dell-per630-11.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com" Why when you expose the "ceph -s" command output the names of the servers running RGW daemons are different from the one you have used to create the RGW daemons? ... rgw: 3 daemons active (test.us-east.dell-per630-11.dbcagc, test.us-east.dell-per630-12.kovdgi, test.us-east.dell-per630-13.yikuae) ... but you said that you executed: ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement dell-per630-13.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement dell-per630-12.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement dell-per630-11.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com sorry. my second question is wrong... :-) (In reply to Juan Miguel Olmo from comment #3) > @Vikhyat Umrao: In all the command you have put the values needed to use > your hosts except in: > > # ceph orch apply rgw myorg us-east-1 --placement="2 myhost1 myhost2" > > Why did you use "myhost1 myhost2" ? instead of: # ceph orch apply rgw myorg us-east-1 --placement="3 dell-per630-13.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com dell-per630-12.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com dell-per630-11.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com" Yes, the first time I had run the same command which you mentioned above, I just gave doc example for explaining that doc method did not help. > > > Why when you expose the "ceph -s" command output the names of the servers > running RGW daemons are different from the one you have used to create the > RGW daemons? Yes, I had run the following commands - ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement dell-per630-13.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement dell-per630-12.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement dell-per630-11.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com but the rgw daemons name came in `ceph -s` short hostnames not as FQDN. > > ... > rgw: 3 daemons active (test.us-east.dell-per630-11.dbcagc, > test.us-east.dell-per630-12.kovdgi, test.us-east.dell-per630-13.yikuae) > ... > > but you said that you executed: > > ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement > dell-per630-13.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com > ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement > dell-per630-12.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com > ceph orch daemon add rgw test us-east --placement > dell-per630-11.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com Can you add the active manager log file?, when you issued the command: ceph orch apply rgw myorg us-east-1 --placement="3 dell-per630-13.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com dell-per630-12.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com dell-per630-11.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com" (In reply to Juan Miguel Olmo from comment #6) > Can you add the active manager log file?, when you issued the command: > > ceph orch apply rgw myorg us-east-1 --placement="3 > dell-per630-13.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com dell-per630-12.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com > dell-per630-11.gsslab.pnq2.redhat.com" Looks like cephadm is not configuring mgr and mons logs. I have created the following bug - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1859267 Juan - as I mentioned in the email this time with downstream version I was able to install the rgws with the help of following command: [root@dell-per630-13 ~]# ceph orch apply rgw test us-east --placement="3 dell-per630-13 dell-per630-12 dell-per630-11" gdoc - https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Q8gPi0-Z_VJKe7uWH-vfuETi5BLj5ffetRw2llCJVN8/edit# I would say I am not able to reproduce in downstream version. Additional thing this time I did match the FQDN and short hostanme as the same so it cephadm does not get confused b/w fqdn and short hostname. Tim - as you mentiond in the IRC for you with downstream bits also this command[1] did not work to create rgws and you had to go with command[2]. [1]ceph orch apply rgw <realm> <zone> --placement="3 host1 host2 host3 ... hostN" [2]ceph orch daemon add rgw <realm> <zone> --placement "host1" Tim - can you please provide active mgr logs. This is the command to get the logs. cephadm logs --fsid <fsid from `ceph -s` command> --name <mgr name from `ceph -s` command> @Juan, Moving this to verified state as issue is not seen with latest image of downstream. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 5.0 bug fix and enhancement), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:3294 |