Bug 1859194

Summary: load_hosts macro duplicated in a list of macros
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Lukáš Hellebrandt <lhellebr>
Component: ReportingAssignee: Dominik Matoulek <dmatoule>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Lukáš Hellebrandt <lhellebr>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.8.0CC: ehelms, mhulan, oprazak, tbrisker
Target Milestone: 6.8.0Keywords: Triaged
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: foreman-2.1.1 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-10-27 13:04:20 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Lukáš Hellebrandt 2020-07-21 12:17:42 UTC
Description of problem:
There's a list of safemode macros usable in report templates. There is load_hosts macro listed twice in there.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Sat 6.8 snap 4.0

How reproducible:
Deterministic

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Monitoring -> Report Templates -> Subscription - General Report
2. Check there is the load_pools macro used
3. Go to Help tab

Actual results:
There is load_hosts macro listed twice.

Expected results:
The load_hosts macro should only be listed once.

Comment 1 Tomer Brisker 2020-07-21 12:26:36 UTC
Connecting redmine issue https://projects.theforeman.org/issues/30196 from this bug

Comment 2 Lukáš Hellebrandt 2020-09-17 14:41:31 UTC
Verified with Sat 6.8 snap 15.

Used reproducer from OP, there is just one load_hosts macro in the list and the macro works.

Comment 5 errata-xmlrpc 2020-10-27 13:04:20 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Important: Satellite 6.8 release), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:4366