Bug 1859814

Summary: F33FailsToInstall: davix-libs
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Igor Raits <igor.raits>
Component: davixAssignee: Adrien Devresse <adev88>
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: adev88, andrea.manzi, georgios.bitzes, mattias.ellert
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-03 19:30:48 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1803235    

Description Igor Raits 2020-07-23 05:38:39 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain).

Your package (davix) Fails To Install in Fedora 33:

can't install davix-libs:
  - nothing provides libgsoapssl++-2.8.91.so()(64bit) needed by davix-libs-0.7.6-1.fc33.x86_64
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/

Thanks!

Comment 1 Mattias Ellert 2020-07-28 06:52:25 UTC
Davix must be rebuilt for the gsoap soname bump.

This would normally have been fixed by the F33 mass rebuild without the maintainer having to do anything.

However, the rebuild failed because the davix package was not adapted to the new definition of the %cmake macro.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds

Comment 2 Mattias Ellert 2020-08-02 08:14:27 UTC
Suggested fix in PR:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/davix/pull-request/1

Comment 3 Mattias Ellert 2020-08-02 09:16:20 UTC
Someone just fixed this and did a rebuild for rawhide. So no more urgent actions are needed.

The fix in master works for Fedora 31 and later.
To work for EPEL 8 the "%cmake_build --target doc" must be changed to "%cmake_build -- doc" due to the older cmake version in RHEL 8 (that would work for Fedora too).

It will not work for EPEL 6 and 7, without adding the tweaks I proposed in my PR. Depends on whether you want the same spec everywhere or not.

Alternatively, if you switch to cmake3 in EPEL 7 you can use the new macros with other names:

%cmake → %cmake3
%cmake_build → %cmake3_build
%cmake_install → &cmake3_install

if you add "%undefine __cmake3_in_source_build" to the specfile.

The %cmake3* macros are defined as aliases for the %cmake* ones in EPEL 8 and Fedora.

This would just leave EPEL 6 as the odd one out (which is EOL before the end of the year), and there would be no tweaks for EPEL 7-8 and Fedora 31+.

Comment 4 Georgios Bitzes 2020-08-03 08:11:28 UTC
Thanks Mattias for the pull request, and useful advice.

As a first step, I'll change the specfile in davix CI based on your suggestions to ensure compatibility with EPEL and older fedora versions.
Having the same specfile everywhere would be nice. Afterwards I'll change the Fedora specfile, too.

I'm not sure it's possible to merge your PR as-is anymore due to the fixes from Igor, should I close it?

Cheers,
Georgios

Comment 5 Igor Raits 2020-08-03 19:30:48 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (ignatenkobrain).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 33.

Thanks for taking care of it!

Comment 6 Mattias Ellert 2020-08-12 18:12:53 UTC
(In reply to Georgios Bitzes from comment #4)
> I'm not sure it's possible to merge your PR as-is anymore due to the fixes
> from Igor, should I close it?

I have rebased the PR onto current master.