Bug 186245

Summary: CVE-2006-1342 Small information leak in SO_ORIGINAL_DST and getname() (CVE-2006-1343)
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2.1 Reporter: Marcel Holtmann <holtmann>
Component: kernelAssignee: Don Howard <dhoward>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 2.1CC: security-response-team
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: Security
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: impact=low,source=netdev,reported=20060304,public=20060304
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2006-0579 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-07-13 11:46:09 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 143573    

Description Marcel Holtmann 2006-03-22 14:53:08 UTC
It appears sockaddr_in.sin_zero is not zeroed during certain operations
returning IPv4 socket names, namely:

- getsockopt(...SO_ORIGINAL_DST...) (2.4 and 2.6)
  see getorigdst() in net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c
  (+ in net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_conntrack_l3proto_ipv4.c in 2.6?!)

- getsockname() and getpeername() (and accept()) (2.4 only)
  see inet_getname() in net/ipv4/af_inet.c

and several unitialized bytes of kernel stack (sizeof(sin_zero) == 6 to be
precise) leak to the userspace.

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=114148078223594&w=2

A patch has been included in Marcelo's 2.4 tree:

http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/marcelo/linux-2.4.git;a=commit;h=09d3b3dcfa80c9094f1748c1be064b9326c9ef2b

Comment 8 Red Hat Bugzilla 2006-07-13 11:46:09 UTC
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2006-0579.html