|Product:||[Fedora] Fedora||Reporter:||Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst>|
|Component:||Package Review||Assignee:||José Matos <jamatos>|
|Status:||CLOSED ERRATA||QA Contact:||Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>|
|Fixed In Version:||Doc Type:||If docs needed, set a value|
|Doc Text:||Story Points:||---|
|Last Closed:||2020-08-17 01:07:49 UTC||Type:||---|
|oVirt Team:||---||RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:|
|Cloudforms Team:||---||Target Upstream Version:|
|Bug Depends On:||1862855|
|Bug Blocks:||1823027, 1862862, 1862881|
Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2020-08-03 04:24:03 UTC
Comment 1 José Matos 2020-08-05 17:21:44 UTC
OK. I lied in the previous review. :-) fedora-review complains that: - Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION - Package requires R-core. The first claim is bogus: $ rpm -qpd 1862859-R-DT/results/R-DT-0.14-1.fc33.noarch.rpm /usr/share/R/library/DT/NEWS.Rd /usr/share/R/library/DT/doc/DT.Rmd /usr/share/R/library/DT/doc/DT.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/doc/index.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/00Index.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/DT-imports.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/R.css /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/coerceValue.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/dataTableAjax.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/dataTableOutput.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/datatable.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/editData.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/formatCurrency.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/proxy.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/replaceData.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/styleInterval.html /usr/share/R/library/DT/html/tableHeader.html The second claim is wrong since this is an R package. FWIW fedora-review also complains that this is not the most update package version, there is a new 0.15 version available at cran that was released two hours ago. Don't you like when this happens? :-) The license is correct and the spec is well written. I trust you to update to the last version on import. The package is approved.
Comment 2 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-08-06 12:32:15 UTC
(fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-DT
Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2020-08-08 23:58:31 UTC
FEDORA-2020-71e61ba627 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-71e61ba627
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2020-08-09 00:01:59 UTC
FEDORA-2020-6c761ff866 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 31. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6c761ff866
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-08-09 03:01:43 UTC
FEDORA-2020-6c761ff866 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-6c761ff866 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-6c761ff866 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-08-09 03:47:44 UTC
FEDORA-2020-71e61ba627 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. In short time you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-71e61ba627 \*` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-71e61ba627 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-08-17 01:07:49 UTC
FEDORA-2020-6c761ff866 has been pushed to the Fedora 31 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-08-17 01:13:40 UTC
FEDORA-2020-71e61ba627 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.