Bug 1862971
Summary: | dsidm user status fails with Error: 'nsUserAccount' object has no attribute 'is_locked' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Viktor Ashirov <vashirov> |
Component: | 389-ds-base | Assignee: | Simon Pichugin <spichugi> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | RHDS QE <ds-qe-bugs> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 8.3 | CC: | afarley, bsmejkal, mreynolds, pasik, sgouvern, spichugi, tbordaz, tony, vashirov |
Target Milestone: | rc | Flags: | pm-rhel:
mirror+
|
Target Release: | 8.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | sync-to-jira | ||
Fixed In Version: | 389-ds-devel-1.4-8040020201105165416.866effaa | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-05-18 15:45:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Viktor Ashirov
2020-08-03 11:02:58 UTC
I'm seeing this as well. I tried adding locking and unlocking the account, in case that action would add the appropriate attribute, but that didn't work. The problem happened with the demo account as well as one I added. This is a new DS installation on a Fedora 32 VM,installed via Cockpit. 389-ds-base.x86_64 1.4.3.12-1.fc32 python3-lib389.noarch 1.4.3.12-1.fc32 [root@fedora389 t]# dsidm -b 'dc=test,dc=com' slapd-testnomer user status demo_user Error: 'nsUserAccount' object has no attribute 'is_locked' [root@fedora389 t]# dsidm -b 'dc=testn,dc=com' slapd-testnomer user lock demo_user locked demo_user [root@fedora389 t]# dsidm -b 'dc=test,dc=com' slapd-testnomer user status demo_user Error: 'nsUserAccount' object has no attribute 'is_locked' [root@fedora389 t]# dsidm -b 'dc=test,dc=com' slapd-testnomer user unlock demo_user unlocked demo_user [root@fedora389 t]# dsidm -b 'dc=test,dc=com' slapd-testnomer user status demo_user Error: 'nsUserAccount' object has no attribute 'is_locked' [root@fedora389 t]# We've depricating 'user status', 'user lock', 'user unlock' as the functionality is present under 'account' and 'role' subcommands. More information can be found here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868052 (In reply to Simon Pichugin from comment #2) > We've depricating 'user status', 'user lock', 'user unlock' as the > functionality is present under 'account' and 'role' subcommands. > > More information can be found here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1868052 Thank you. This is certainly some fresh information. When I try with the 'account entry-status' command, the system does not produce the 'nsUserAccount' object has no attribute 'is_locked' error. Does that mean there is no problem with the accounts and that, perhaps, the 'user status' command is not being updated, so is treating the account record incorrectly? -Tony (In reply to Tony from comment #3) > Thank you. This is certainly some fresh information. When I try with the > 'account entry-status' command, the system does not produce the > 'nsUserAccount' object has no attribute 'is_locked' error. Does that mean > there is no problem with the accounts and that, perhaps, the 'user status' > command is not being updated, so is treating the account record incorrectly? > > -Tony Yes, probably, there is no problems with your accounts. 'user status/lock/unlock' were broken after we implemented all of the functionality in the 'account' subcommand. 'user status/lock/unlock' will be depricated with the next build (the change is already in 'master'). And thanks for the testing! Excellent. Thank you! I've checked the fix on a scratch build, there are still some issues (copy-pasted message): [root@server-f32 ds]# dsidm -D cn=directory\ manager -w password server-f32 -b dc=example,dc=com account entry-status Enter dn to check : uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com Entry DN: uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com Entry Creation Date: 20200826153047Z (2020-08-26 15:30:47) Entry Modification Date: 20200826153047Z (2020-08-26 15:30:47) Entry State: activated [root@server-f32 ds]# dsidm -D cn=directory\ manager -w password server-f32 -b dc=example,dc=com account lock Enter dn to check : uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com Entry uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com is locked The message should be "Enter dn to lock" [root@server-f32 ds]# dsidm -D cn=directory\ manager -w password server-f32 -b dc=example,dc=com account unlock Enter dn to check : uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com Entry uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com is unlocked The message should be "Enter dn to unlock" The rest looks good, `entry-status/lock/unlock` were moved from `user` to `account` subcommand. (In reply to Viktor Ashirov from comment #11) > I've checked the fix on a scratch build, there are still some issues > (copy-pasted message): > > [root@server-f32 ds]# dsidm -D cn=directory\ manager -w password server-f32 > -b dc=example,dc=com account entry-status > Enter dn to check : uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com > Entry DN: uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com > Entry Creation Date: 20200826153047Z (2020-08-26 15:30:47) > Entry Modification Date: 20200826153047Z (2020-08-26 15:30:47) > Entry State: activated > > [root@server-f32 ds]# dsidm -D cn=directory\ manager -w password server-f32 > -b dc=example,dc=com account lock > Enter dn to check : uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com > Entry uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com is locked > > The message should be "Enter dn to lock" > > [root@server-f32 ds]# dsidm -D cn=directory\ manager -w password server-f32 > -b dc=example,dc=com account unlock > Enter dn to check : uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com > Entry uid=test,ou=people,dc=example,dc=com is unlocked > > The message should be "Enter dn to unlock" > > The rest looks good, `entry-status/lock/unlock` were moved from `user` to > `account` subcommand. The changes are made. The fix is in master, 1.4.2, and 1.4.3. ==================================================================================== test session starts ===================================================================================== platform linux -- Python 3.6.8, pytest-6.1.2, py-1.9.0, pluggy-0.13.1 -- /usr/bin/python3.6 cachedir: .pytest_cache metadata: {'Python': '3.6.8', 'Platform': 'Linux-4.18.0-247.el8.x86_64-x86_64-with-redhat-8.4-Ootpa', 'Packages': {'pytest': '6.1.2', 'py': '1.9.0', 'pluggy': '0.13.1'}, 'Plugins': {'metadata': '1.10.0', 'html': '2.1.1', 'libfaketime': '0.1.2'}} 389-ds-base: 1.4.3.16-1.module+el8.4.0+8740+d5ec8778 nss: 3.53.1-11.el8_2 nspr: 4.25.0-2.el8_2 openldap: 2.4.46-16.el8 cyrus-sasl: 2.1.27-5.el8 FIPS: disabled rootdir: /mnt/tests/rhds/tests/upstream/ds/dirsrvtests, configfile: pytest.ini plugins: metadata-1.10.0, html-2.1.1, libfaketime-0.1.2 collected 1 item dirsrvtests/tests/suites/clu/dsidm_account_test.py::test_dsidm_account_entry_status_with_lock PASSED [100%] =============================================================================== 1 passed in 10.29s ========================================================================================== Marking as Verified:Tested. verified:tested (see comment 17) with build 389-ds-1.4-8040020201125182123.866effaa / 389-ds-base-libs-1.4.3.16-2.module+el8.4.0+8803+fd0f8fe3.x86_64 -> marking as VERIFIED Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (389-ds:1.4 bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:1835 |