Bug 1866034

Summary: "Scaled to 0" text appears to be too large for pod ring
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Samuel Padgett <spadgett>
Component: Dev ConsoleAssignee: Jeff Phillips <jephilli>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Gajanan More <gamore>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.6CC: aos-bugs, jephilli, nmukherj
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.6.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Version: 4.6.0-0.nightly-2020-08-02-134243 Cluster ID: 6de0fe23-5d9b-4add-a336-1efc5fad0306 Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:80.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/80.0
Last Closed: 2020-10-27 16:23:15 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Screenshot
none
Screenshot of scaled to zero none

Description Samuel Padgett 2020-08-04 17:21:48 UTC
Created attachment 1710391 [details]
Screenshot

The "Scaled to 0" text for a deployment pod ring overlaps with the ring itself. I'm not sure if this is intentional or not, but it looked strange to my eye. Opening a bug in case this isn't intended.

See attached screenshot.

Comment 4 Gajanan More 2020-08-24 12:53:43 UTC
Created attachment 1712355 [details]
Screenshot of scaled to zero

Comment 5 Gajanan More 2020-08-24 12:54:39 UTC
I have validated the bugzilla on:

Build: 4.6.0-0.nightly-2020-08-23-214712

Browser: Google Chrome Version 84.0.4147.89 

Marking this as verified.

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2020-10-27 16:23:15 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 GA Images), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4196