Bug 1867538
| Summary: | Move vifs from spec to status field on KuryrPort CRD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Maysa Macedo <mdemaced> |
| Component: | Networking | Assignee: | rdobosz |
| Networking sub component: | kuryr | QA Contact: | GenadiC <gcheresh> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | Docs Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | ||
| Priority: | unspecified | CC: | mdulko, rlobillo |
| Version: | 4.6 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | 4.6.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-10-27 16:26:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Maysa Macedo
2020-08-10 10:07:12 UTC
Before this change, you can observe, that all the information about vifs are on the KuryrPort CRD under 'spec' key. Steps to reproduce: 1. perform cluter install 2. execute "kubectl --image kuryr/demo demo" 3. wait till "kubectl get pod" got the running state 4. "kubectl get kp <kp-name> -o json| jq -C '.status'" should return null, while "kubectl get kp <kp-name> -o json| jq -C '.spec.vifs'" should return several information regarding vifs After change was applied: 1. do point 1-3 from previously described steps 2. "kubectl get kp <kp-name> -o json| jq -C '.spec'" should return null 3. "kubectl get kp <kp-name> -o json| jq -C '.status.vifs'" should return information about vifs. > 2. "kubectl get kp <kp-name> -o json| jq -C '.spec'" should return null
Should be:
"kubectl get kp <kp-name> -o json| jq -C '.spec.vifs'" should return null
Verified on 4.6.0-0.nightly-2020-09-03-063148 over RHOS-16.1-RHEL-8-20200831.n.1.
[stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ kubectl get kp -o json | jq '.items[0].spec'
{
"podNodeName": "ostest-6dh4x-worker-0-bdrmv",
"podUid": "2ca062d2-71d6-4f48-88b5-7425d070ab68"
}
[stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ kubectl get kp -o json | jq '.items[0].spec.vifs'
null
[stack@undercloud-0 ~]$ kubectl get kp -o json | jq '.items[0].status.vifs'
{
"eth0": {
"default": true,
"vif": {
"versioned_object.data": {
"active": true,
"address": "fa:16:3e:ac:33:20",
"has_traffic_filtering": false,
"id": "08b09e45-1ae9-423f-b33b-dde3b18648f7",
"network": {
"versioned_object.data": {
"id": "1462363a-6204-4753-91e1-ead5af5ac351",
"label": "ns/test-net",
"mtu": 1442,
"multi_host": false,
"should_provide_bridge": false,
"should_provide_vlan": false,
"subnets": {
"versioned_object.data": {
"objects": [
{
"versioned_object.data": {
"cidr": "10.128.116.0/23",
"dns": [],
"gateway": "10.128.116.1",
"ips": {
"versioned_object.data": {
"objects": [
{
"versioned_object.data": {
"address": "10.128.116.141"
},
"versioned_object.name": "FixedIP",
"versioned_object.namespace": "os_vif",
"versioned_object.version": "1.0"
}
]
},
"versioned_object.name": "FixedIPList",
"versioned_object.namespace": "os_vif",
"versioned_object.version": "1.0"
},
"routes": {
"versioned_object.data": {
"objects": []
},
"versioned_object.name": "RouteList",
"versioned_object.namespace": "os_vif",
"versioned_object.version": "1.0"
}
},
"versioned_object.name": "Subnet",
"versioned_object.namespace": "os_vif",
"versioned_object.version": "1.0"
}
]
},
"versioned_object.name": "SubnetList",
"versioned_object.namespace": "os_vif",
"versioned_object.version": "1.0"
}
},
"versioned_object.name": "Network",
"versioned_object.namespace": "os_vif",
"versioned_object.version": "1.1"
},
"plugin": "noop",
"preserve_on_delete": false,
"vif_name": "tap08b09e45-1a",
"vlan_id": 2336
},
"versioned_object.name": "VIFVlanNested",
"versioned_object.namespace": "os_vif",
"versioned_object.version": "1.0"
}
}
}
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.6 GA Images), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4196 |