Bug 186963
Summary: | how to sign CLA with subkey | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Fedora Infrastructure | Reporter: | Karsten Wade <kwade> |
Component: | Account System | Assignee: | Mike McGrath <imlinux> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | unspecified | CC: | bleher, nman64 |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem/CLAHowTo | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | FAS2 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2008-03-17 18:00:42 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Karsten Wade
2006-03-27 18:44:20 UTC
It would also be helpful if the reject mail included some information why the signature failed to verify (the gpg command line and output would already help a lot in some cases); in my case I first had a buggy gpg version which produced invalid output (--clearsign worked but -a --sign did not) - if the command output were included in the returned mail it would have been easier to figure out the problem. This problem should no longer exist in FAS2 (since GPG signed emails are no longer required). |