Bug 1871953
Summary: | Deprecate package: peripety | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | David Lehman <dlehman> |
Component: | doc-Release_Notes-8-en-US | Assignee: | Lucie Vařáková <lmanasko> |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | RHEL DPM <rhel-docs> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | Marek Suchánek <msuchane> |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 8.2 | CC: | jklech, mpershin, rhel-docs, yselkowi |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Documentation |
Target Release: | 8.3 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Deprecated Functionality | |
Doc Text: |
.`peripety` is deprecated
The `peripety` package is deprecated since RHEL 8.3.
The Peripety storage event notification daemon parses system storage logs into structured storage events. It helps you investigate storage issues.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-05-26 05:57:18 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
David Lehman
2020-08-24 16:48:01 UTC
Hi David, I've written a short and basic release note to announce the deprecation. I've used the upstream repo to learn about peripety. I have two questions: * Do we want to state our reason for the deprecation or point to a recommended alternative to peripety? * Just to make sure, is peripety deprecated or removed in RHEL 8.3? (In reply to Marek Suchánek from comment #1) > Hi David, > I've written a short and basic release note to announce the deprecation. > I've used the upstream repo to learn about peripety. > > I have two questions: > > * Do we want to state our reason for the deprecation or point to a > recommended alternative to peripety? We are going a different direction with new development efforts, but there isn't anything specific to announce or recommend as a replacement at this time. > > * Just to make sure, is peripety deprecated or removed in RHEL 8.3? It is deprecated in RHEL-8.3. The plan is to not include it in RHEL-9. (In reply to David Lehman from comment #2) > (In reply to Marek Suchánek from comment #1) > > Hi David, > > I've written a short and basic release note to announce the deprecation. > > I've used the upstream repo to learn about peripety. > > > > I have two questions: > > > > * Do we want to state our reason for the deprecation or point to a > > recommended alternative to peripety? > > We are going a different direction with new development efforts, but there > isn't anything specific to announce or recommend as a replacement at this > time. > > > > > * Just to make sure, is peripety deprecated or removed in RHEL 8.3? > > It is deprecated in RHEL-8.3. The plan is to not include it in RHEL-9. Alright. In that case, I think I can leave the release note as is. Thanks! Since the issue described in this bug should be resolved (VERIFIED), it has been closed with a resolution of CURRENTRELEASE. If the fix for this is not released yet, check if this will ever get fixed. In case of a negative answer (ex: for zstream releases that won't be updated anymore) then please change it as WONTFIX. If there's anything else to be done on this BZ, if it's still active, please reopen this bug with comment. Please note: for those bugs which are not included in errata, please add keyword 'TestOnly'. TestOnly: Use this when there is no code delivery involved, or for use when code is already upstream and will be incorporated automatically to the next release for testing purposes only. Thank you. |