Bug 187196

Summary: Review Request: kernel-module-rt2500
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kyle Yencer <kyle>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: caolanm, davidf, eric.tanguy, gauret, kevin
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-01-25 16:12:06 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Kyle Yencer 2006-03-29 04:26:01 UTC
Spec Name or Url: kernel-module-rt2500.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://files.yencer.net/pub/fedora/extras/4/SRPMS/kernel-module-rt2500-0.0.0.20060328-1.src.rpm
Description: RALink Tech RT2500 Wireless Kernel Module

Comment 1 Ville Skyttä 2006-03-29 06:47:21 UTC
Please see thinkpad-kmod, thinkpad-kmod-common, lirc-kmod and lirc-kmod-common
in Extras CVS (devel branch) [1] and bug 177583, bug 177584 for how kernel
modules should be packaged in Extras.

[1] http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/?root=extras

Comment 2 Kyle Yencer 2006-03-29 23:39:35 UTC
Updated SPEC to fit design, please re-review.

Spec Name or Url: rt2500-kmod.spec
SRPM Name or Url:
http://files.yencer.net/pub/fedora/extras/4/SRPMS/rt2500-kmod-2006032818-1.2.6.15_1.1833_FC4.src.rpm
Description: RT2500 kernel modules

Comment 3 Ville Skyttä 2006-03-30 17:16:02 UTC
Just to clarify, I don't have hardware to test this with, so I'm not really
planning to participate more in the review.

Comment 4 Kyle Yencer 2006-03-30 17:34:02 UTC
I have the hardware, I will test and post results.

Comment 5 Eric Tanguy 2006-07-05 21:33:41 UTC
No news ?

Comment 6 David Fraser 2006-09-23 18:45:43 UTC
Actual module built successfully for me with this on FC4 with kernel
2.6.17_1.2142_FC4, i686, no smp
Couldn't build as non-root user as make install does /sbin/depmod -a and also
installs directly into /lib/modules - DESTDIR apparently doing nothing
tried to fix it up, then discovered bug 202528 and bug 202529
These are much more up to date and correct and build successfully, so this bug
should probably be marked as a duplicated of them...

Comment 7 Kevin Fenzi 2006-10-01 21:18:27 UTC
Kyle: Any news? Would you be willing to close this in favor of the more up to 
date 202528 submission?


Comment 9 Warren Togami 2007-01-25 16:12:06 UTC
Closing due to lack of response in a reasonable length of time.  If you have an
updated package for submission, please open a new ticket.