Bug 1876447
Summary: | [16.1.0->16.1.1][DCN] Ceph upgrade is failing for as ansible is not considering the ceph cluster name | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Khomesh Thakre <kthakre> |
Component: | Ceph-Ansible | Assignee: | Francesco Pantano <fpantano> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Ameena Suhani S H <amsyedha> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | Aron Gunn <agunn> |
Priority: | urgent | ||
Version: | 4.1 | CC: | agunn, aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, fpantano, gabrioux, gfidente, gmeno, gsitlani, johfulto, mbultel, nchandek, nthomas, owalsh, schhabdi, tlapierr, tserlin, vereddy, ykaul, yrabl |
Target Milestone: | z2 | Flags: | yrabl:
automate_bug-
|
Target Release: | 4.1 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | ceph-ansible-4.0.30-1.el8cp, ceph-ansible-4.0.30-1.el7cp | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
.The {storage-product} rolling update fails when multiple storage clusters exist
Running the Ceph Ansible `rolling_update.yml` playbook when multiple storage clusters are configured, would cause the rolling update to fail because a storage cluster name could not be specified. With this release, the `rolling_update.yml` playbook uses the `--cluster` option to allow for a specific storage cluster name.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-09-30 17:26:56 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1760354, 1816167 |
Description
Khomesh Thakre
2020-09-07 08:56:11 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Red Hat Ceph Storage 4.1 Bug Fix update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:4144 |