Summary: | libvirtd[32318]: internal error: Invalid unsigned integer value '-1' in file '/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/die_id' | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 | Reporter: | Frank Liang <xiliang> |
Component: | libvirt | Assignee: | Daniel Henrique Barboza (IBM) <dbarboza> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Frank Liang <xiliang> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | low | ||
Version: | 8.3 | CC: | abologna, dbarboza, drjones, jdenemar, jsuchane, lcapitulino, leiwang, linl, ribarry, virt-maint, vkuznets, ymao |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | 8.3 | ||
Hardware: | aarch64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | libvirt-6.0.0-29.el8 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2021-05-18 15:21:44 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | Red Hat1885655 |
Description
Frank Liang
2020-09-08 06:17:47 UTC
We don't have a die ID on AArch64, so I agree with the proposed solution in comment 0. Daniel, would you please backport you upstream patch mentioned in comment 0? Seems like this is non-x86_64 problem. Thanks. Hi, (In reply to Jaroslav Suchanek from comment #3) > Daniel, would you please backport you upstream patch mentioned in comment 0? > Seems like this is non-x86_64 problem. > > Thanks. Backport of upstream 0137bf0dab2738d544 to RHEL-8.3.0 was posted downstream. Xiao, Would you take this as the QA contact and help verify it? Actually, I just realized that you reproduced this issue on RHEL-8.3 non-AV. For aarch64, only AV is supported for a single customer. Maybe it's good to have the fix anyways, but would you help checking if AV has this issue (probably not, due to the date of the upstream commit...) Thanks! (In reply to Luiz Capitulino from comment #8) > Maybe it's good to have the fix anyways, but would you help > checking if AV has this issue (probably not, due to the date > of the upstream commit...) > The commit is already present in the rhel-av-8.3.0 tree. The issue shouldn't be reproduced with AV. Thanks, DHB (In reply to Luiz Capitulino from comment #8) > Xiao, > > Would you take this as the QA contact and help verify it? yes. > > Actually, I just realized that you reproduced this issue on > RHEL-8.3 non-AV. For aarch64, only AV is supported for a single > customer. > > Maybe it's good to have the fix anyways, but would you help > checking if AV has this issue (probably not, due to the date > of the upstream commit...) > AV does not have this issue. # rpm -qa|grep libvirt-6 python3-libvirt-6.0.0-1.module+el8.3.0+6423+e4cb6418.aarch64 libvirt-6.6.0-6.module+el8.3.0+8125+aefcf088.aarch64 # journalctl -u libvirtd -- Logs begin at Thu 2020-10-15 22:10:05 EDT, end at Fri 2020-10-16 02:10:24 EDT. -- Oct 16 02:10:19 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com systemd[1]: Starting Virtualization daemon... Oct 16 02:10:19 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com systemd[1]: Started Virtualization daemon. Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1965]: listening on virbr0(#3): 192.168.122.1 Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: started, version 2.79 cachesize 150 Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: compile time options: IPv6 GNU-getopt DBus no-i18n IDN2 DHCP DHCPv6 no-Lua TFTP no-conntrack ipse> Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq-dhcp[1984]: DHCP, IP range 192.168.122.2 -- 192.168.122.254, lease time 1h Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq-dhcp[1984]: DHCP, sockets bound exclusively to interface virbr0 Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: reading /etc/resolv.conf Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: using nameserver 10.19.42.41#53 Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: using nameserver 10.11.5.19#53 Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: using nameserver 10.5.30.160#53 Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: read /etc/hosts - 2 addresses Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq[1984]: read /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.addnhosts - 0 addresses Oct 16 02:10:20 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com dnsmasq-dhcp[1984]: read /var/lib/libvirt/dnsmasq/default.hostsfile Oct 15 22:12:26 ampere-hr330a-05.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com systemd[1]: libvirtd.service: Succeeded. Tested pass in RHEL-8.4.0-20201222.n.0, so move it to 'VERIFIED'. # rpm -qa |grep libvirt-6 python3-libvirt-6.0.0-1.module+el8.3.0+6423+e4cb6418.aarch64 libvirt-6.0.0-32.module+el8.4.0+9172+b707c649.aarch64 # uname -r 4.18.0-265.el8.aarch64 # cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/topology/die_id -1 Dec 23 03:19:25 ampere-hr330a-04.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com libvirtd[22765]: libvirt version: 6.0.0, package: 32.module+el8.4.0+9172+b707c649 (Red Hat, Inc. <http://bugz> Dec 23 03:19:25 ampere-hr330a-04.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com libvirtd[22765]: hostname: ampere-hr330a-04.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com Dec 23 03:19:25 ampere-hr330a-04.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com libvirtd[22765]: this function is not supported by the connection driver: cannot detect host CPU model for aa> Dec 23 03:19:25 ampere-hr330a-04.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com libvirtd[22765]: this function is not supported by the connection driver: cannot detect host CPU model for aa> Dec 23 03:19:26 ampere-hr330a-04.khw4.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com systemd[1]: Listening on Virtual machine log manager socket. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: virt:rhel and virt-devel:rhel security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1762 |