Bug 18768
| Summary: | RPM v4 not documented at www.rpm.org! | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Linux | Reporter: | Deven T. Corzine <deven> |
| Component: | rpm | Assignee: | Jeff Johnson <jbj> |
| Status: | CLOSED WORKSFORME | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 7.0 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| URL: | http://www.rpm.org/ | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2000-10-10 03:57:06 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Deven T. Corzine
2000-10-10 03:57:00 UTC
rpm-4.0 has been documented at http://www.rpm.org for at least the last month ... Okay, maybe it's been documented for the past month. I filed this bug report over SEVEN months ago -- why was it ignored for so long? (Do you really expect people to bother reporting bugs if the reports are going to be ignored?) No, 7 months is a long time. Meanwhile, you're assuming that I have something to do with www.rpm.org, and that hasn't been the case until recently. bugzilla is for reporting bugs against packages, not about problems with Red Hat peripheral services. I don't assume anything about you, since I don't know you. All I'm assuming is that someone should respond to bug reports in this system in a more timely manner, even if it's only to say "go talk to so-and-so instead." The fact that it took over 7 months to receive a response makes it much less likely that I'll report the next bug I discover. I did consider this an indirect problem with the package, though. It didn't seem right to be using a version of RPM that nobody else could get without using Red Hat 7.0 -- it became very difficult to try to rebuild rawhide packages for Red Hat 6.2, for example... |