Bug 1876847
| Summary: | DNF installs i686 package version instead of x86_64 under some circumstances | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 34 | CC: | dmach, jmracek, jrohel, lhrazky, mblaha, mhatina, packaging-team-maint, pkratoch, plautrba, rpm-software-management, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-06-08 00:47:58 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Ondrej Mosnacek
2020-09-08 10:42:37 UTC
Hello, thanks for the report. Can you please share debugsolver data for the transaction? Run: dnf install libselinux libselinux-devel --debugsolver This will create a debugdata directory in your current directory. I'm afraid it will likely be too big to attach to the bug, maybe put it somewhere for download? We have multiple related issues that all deal with installing wrong architectures in one way or another: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1748454 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855028 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1782899 They all have a corresponding bug reported on upstream libsolv, but so far there's little progress in resolving them. This one is likely a similar case. We have it on our backlog, but if libsolv upstream doesn't fix it, it will take some time on our side to do it, as the issue is quite complex. debugdata available here: https://omos.fedorapeople.org/shared_files/bz1876847_debugdata.tar.gz The linked bugs don't sound like the same issue as here, although the first two might be related, who knows... This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle. Changing version to 34. This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 34 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 34 on 2022-06-07. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '34'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 34 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed. Fedora Linux 34 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2022-06-07. Fedora Linux 34 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |