Bug 187828
| Summary: | Review Request: log4net - A tool to output log statements to a variety of output targets | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christian Nolte <ch.nolte> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Christopher Brown <chris.brown> |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | kevin, opensource |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2007-09-09 11:12:33 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 201449 | ||
|
Description
Christian Nolte
2006-04-03 19:36:40 UTC
Build failed: dos2unix: command not found Is that log4net.key file a key you generated? I think that should be commented in the spec, where it came from. The %_libdir macro isn't going to work. I have not got to that part of the build yet but I am reasonably sure it'll install to /usr/lib on x86_64 and fail. With dos2unix as a BuildRequires, I get this: Target(s) specified: compile-all BUILD FAILED /builddir/build/BUILD/log4net-1.2.9/log4net.include(188,14): The current target framework (Mono 2.0 Profile) is not supported by log4net. Ping Christian. Are you still interested in submitting this package? If so, can you address the build failure in comment #2 and upload a new version? John: If you are reviewing this, please set the fedora-review flag to ? If I don't hear anything I will close this review in 1 week. Not reviewing this anymore, reassigning to nobody. Sorry, but I currently have no time at hand to work on this. As a side note: this package is needed by ifolder3 which I tried to package back then. See also: http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2006-April/msg00052.html. Perhaps this could be of help if someone wants to work on that (ifolder is on the wishlist). ok. I will go ahead an close this now then. If you get some time, feel free to resubmit it or reopen this review request. Sorry for the noise folks. I would like to re-open this review request. Spec URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net.spec SRPM URL: http://snecker.fedorapeople.org/log4net/log4net-1.2.10-1.fc7.src.rpm Comments: - This is a mono package and find-debuginfo.sh is failing to generate the requisite package, though I understand this is somewhat commonplace. - Nant is used to build the package with Strong Name signing. - Rpmlint is quiet on source, no doc error on devel and complains about no binary in binary rpm. I understand the latter is also not a blocker. I am already the maintainer of a couple of other packages and log4net forms part of around 4-5 which require iFolder to work on Fedora. Comments appreciated. Cheers Chris Chirs, you cannot review you own package, so you should not assign this package to you and set fedora-review to " ", otherwise no reviewer will find this review request. I did by accident, because I used the wrong query. ;-) Also I guess the FE-DEADREVIEW blocker should be removed and you should add yourself to CC. Or maybe you should open a new review request, to make you reporter of the review request, I am not sure. |