Bug 187891
Summary: | php package should provide mod_php, php-apache, php-apache2 or similar | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Tim Jackson <rpm> |
Component: | php | Assignee: | Joe Orton <jorton> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | EasyFix | ||
Fixed In Version: | 5.1.4-1 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-05-17 11:55:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Tim Jackson
2006-04-04 11:07:15 UTC
I don't like any of these choices realy. There is no "mod_php", like there is a "mod_perl"; there is just PHP; but I guess that is the least of a bad bunch. Apache == ASF, not the Apache HTTP Server. "php-httpd", the other choice, means nothing much to anybody. (p.s. see also bug 177821 :) There is no actual file called "mod_php" (although there used to be in earlier versions <4), but I'm not sure that makes it any less a candidate for having a mod_php Provide; PHP (the Apache HTTPD module) is a module in the same was as all other dynamically-loadable modules. I know the Apache vs ASF distinction, but was trying to be practical (and, as you say, php-httpd doesn't mean anything) :) We could have Provides: php-apache-httpd but that's a bit clumsy :) mod_php is the way to go, I reckon. Provides: mod_php is in the 5.1.4 update currently on its way to updates. Fixed in 5.1.4-1, thanks for the report. |