Bug 1879520
Summary: | "many-to-many matching not allowed: matching labels must be unique on one side" warn info for "record: cluster:kubelet_volume_stats_used_bytes:provisioner:sum" | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Junqi Zhao <juzhao> | ||||||
Component: | Monitoring | Assignee: | Pawel Krupa <pkrupa> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Junqi Zhao <juzhao> | ||||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | low | ||||||||
Version: | 4.6 | CC: | akhaire, alegrand, anpicker, armin.kunaschik, asachan, carl-johan.schenstrom, deads, erooth, gparente, hgomes, jnaess, kakkoyun, lcosic, mbukatov, mloibl, naygupta, pkrupa, spasquie, surbania, wking | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression, UpcomingSprint | ||||||
Target Release: | 4.7.0 | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2020-12-04 13:17:14 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Junqi Zhao
2020-09-16 13:01:03 UTC
I cannot reproduce this. Could you share output value for following metrics: - kubelet_volume_stats_used_bytes - kube_persistentvolumeclaim_info - kube_storageclass_info Created attachment 1715088 [details]
monitoring dump file
*** Bug 1886177 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Created solution https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5459581 to track this BZ. @hgomes The KCS is about 4.4. This BZ is about 4.6 and describes a different issue. Killing the node-exporter pods does not fix the 4.6 issue. @Armin. The article (currently in progress) corresponding to this issue is: https://access.redhat.com/solutions/5594541 I don't think there's a workaround for this since it's related to several storage classes with same provisioner as stated before in this bug report. The rule has to be re-worked and the only possibility would be to silent the rule, imho. Engineering will give more details as possible. *** Bug 1897674 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Closing in favor of 1903464. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1903464 *** The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days |