Bug 1883487

Summary:	Moving from One RGW per node to Two RGW per node fails while using site.yml playbook with --limit rgws option with ceph-ansible multisite configured on RHCS 4.2 bare metal cluster
Product:	[Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage	Reporter:	Manasa <mgowri>
Component:	Ceph-Ansible	Assignee:	Guillaume Abrioux <gabrioux>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:	Ameena Suhani S H <amsyedha>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	4.1	CC:	aschoen, ceph-eng-bugs, ceph-qe-bugs, gmeno, nthomas, vashastr, ykaul
Target Milestone:	rc
Target Release:	4.*
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-09-29 14:24:03 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Manasa 2020-09-29 11:17:53 UTC

Description of problem:
moving from One RGW per node to Two RGW per node fails while using site.yml playbook with --limit rgws option with ceph-ansible multisite configured on RHCS 4.2 bare metal cluster


cli used: ansible-playbook site.yml -i hosts --limit rgws

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ceph version 14.2.11-34.el8cp
ceph-ansible-4.0.34-1.el8cp.noarch
ansible-2.9.13-1.el8ae.noarch


How reproducible:2/2


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Deploy RHCS 4.2 cluster on bare metal.
2. Change the settings in all.yml to add radosgw_num_instances: 2
3. Rerun the site.yml playbook with --limit rgws option

Actual results:
Playbook fails with error and only one rgw instance is found per node.

Expected results:
2 rgw instances are enabled per node.


Additional info:
Attached the inventory, all.yml and ansible log for the error.

Comment 1 RHEL Program Management 2020-09-29 11:17:55 UTC

Please specify the severity of this bug. Severity is defined here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/page.cgi?id=fields.html#bug_severity.

Comment 3 Guillaume Abrioux 2020-09-29 14:24:03 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1881313 ***