Bug 1884951
| Summary: | clangllvm plugin is installed in wrong directory on i686 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst> |
| Component: | annobin | Assignee: | Nick Clifton <nickc> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 34 | CC: | fweimer, jakub, nickc |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | annobin-9.35-2.fc34 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2022-06-08 06:30:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Elliott Sales de Andrade
2020-10-03 21:18:13 UTC
I don't think clang searches there, even: $ clang -print-search-dirs programs: =/usr/bin:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/10/../../../../i686-redhat-linux/bin libraries: =/usr/lib/clang/11.0.0:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/10:/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/10/../../..:/usr/bin/../lib:/lib:/usr/lib Hi Elliot, Thanks for reporting this problem. I have now updated the annobin.spec file to extract the first directory listed after "libraries" in the output from 'clang --print-search-dirs'. I hope that this will prove to be the correct location... By the way, does this mean that you are (trying to) using the annobin plugin with clang ? If so, I would love to hear about how it is going. Cheers Nick Fixed in: annobin-9.35-2.fc34 No sorry, I just have something that checks /usr/lib64/clang/ and /usr/lib/clang/, which was confused by the lib64 directory existing. PS, I think this also affects F33 as well. (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #3) > No sorry, I just have something that checks /usr/lib64/clang/ and > /usr/lib/clang/, which was confused by the lib64 directory existing. Ah - that makes sense. > PS, I think this also affects F33 as well. Yes and no. Yes the bug is in the annobin.spec file for F33. But the Clang and LLVM plugins are not built or installed for F33. Well not unless you build with "--with clangplugin --with llvmplugin", so it is unlikely that anyone will come across the problem. (I have started enabling the plugins by default in rawhide as an experiment to see if there are problems). This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle. Changing version to 34. This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 34 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 34 on 2022-06-07. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a 'version' of '34'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' to a later Fedora Linux version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora Linux 34 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version prior to this bug being closed. Fedora Linux 34 entered end-of-life (EOL) status on 2022-06-07. Fedora Linux 34 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. |