Bug 1888583
| Summary: | [External] When deployment is attempted without specifying the monitoring-endpoint while generating JSON, the CSV is stuck in installing state | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage | Reporter: | Rachael <rgeorge> |
| Component: | rook | Assignee: | arun kumar mohan <amohan> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Rachael <rgeorge> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 4.6 | CC: | asachan, kmurarka, madam, muagarwa, nberry, ocs-bugs, ratamir, shan |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | AutomationBackLog |
| Target Release: | OCS 4.6.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | 4.6.0-153.ci | Doc Type: | No Doc Update |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2020-12-17 06:24:47 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Arun, PTAL. Thanks. It seems that the ceph cluster reports "dell-r740-001.dsal.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com" so the script needs to resolve the IP. PR is up for review : https://github.com/rook/rook/pull/6473 backport PR merged Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage 4.6.0 security, bug fix, enhancement update), and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5605 |
Script found this monitoring endpoint: The {"MonitoringEndpoint": "dell-r740-001.dsal.lab.eng.rdu2.redhat.com", "MonitoringPort": "9283"} But instead of IP it passed the hostname which is not what validation code was expecting, this should be fixed but I am not sure whether in script or validation code.