Bug 1888846

Summary: [DDF] After installing OCS, there are two S3 api endpoints available (one provided through Noobaa and another via Ceph
Product: Red Hat OpenShift Container Storage Reporter: Direct Docs Feedback <ddf-bot>
Component: documentationAssignee: Anjana Suparna Sriram <asriram>
Status: NEW --- QA Contact: Raz Tamir <ratamir>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.5CC: agantony, asriram, etamir, kbg, nbecker, ocs-bugs
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:

Description Direct Docs Feedback 2020-10-15 22:22:22 UTC
After installing OCS, there are two S3 api endpoints available (one provided through Noobaa and another via Ceph RGW). We should document the difference between these two services. In which situations would someone prefer one over the other?

Reported by: lkellogg

https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_openshift_container_storage/4.5/html/managing_openshift_container_storage/multicloud-object-gateway_rhocs#annotations:c9375b85-6358-4581-85df-ea227882220c