Note: This bug is displayed in read-only format because the product is no longer active in Red Hat Bugzilla.
This project is now read‑only. Starting Monday, February 2, please use https://ibm-ceph.atlassian.net/ for all bug tracking management.

Bug 1892474

Summary: [RFE] [RADOS - Stretch Cluster] - Allow moving back to normal mode from stretch cluster mode.
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage Reporter: Manohar Murthy <mmurthy>
Component: RADOSAssignee: Kamoltat (Junior) Sirivadhna <ksirivad>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Vipin M S <vips>
Severity: high Docs Contact: Rivka Pollack <rpollack>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 4.2CC: akupczyk, bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, gfarnum, jcaratza, ksirivad, ngangadh, nojha, pdhiran, rpollack, rzarzyns, sseshasa, support, vereddy, vumrao
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: 9.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: ceph-20.1.0-63 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Enhanced support for moving stretch mode to normal mode Previously, Ceph clusters operating in stretch mode could not be reverted to normal mode without manual intervention. With this enhancement, Ceph introduces a command that allows users to gracefully exit stretch mode. ---- ceph mon disable_stretch_mode <crush_rule> --yes-i-really-mean-it ---- Users may optionally specify a CRUSH rule to which all pools should be migrated. If no rule is provided, Ceph automatically selects a default replicated CRUSH rule.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2026-01-29 06:46:40 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 2388233    

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2020-10-29 07:09:34 UTC
Why would we do that? Who's asking for such a feature?

Comment 3 Greg Farnum 2020-11-13 23:22:20 UTC
It just seems reasonable that we be able to turn off a feature which has such wide-ranging impacts. This should be easy to implement given the architecture but it's getting pushed down my list by requests from Rook that are turning up now we're actually trying to integrate it into their way of life.

Comment 4 Yaniv Kaul 2021-01-06 16:31:08 UTC
This is (to the best of my knowledge) and OCS requested feature - they are not going to go back.
Deferring to 5.1, at least.

Comment 22 support 2024-06-25 10:00:37 UTC
Note to downstream, there is an upstream too ;-), see this tracker: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/64840

Comment 33 errata-xmlrpc 2026-01-29 06:46:40 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: Red Hat Ceph Storage 9.0 Security and Enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:1536