Bug 189253

Summary: Bizaare multiple mounting of multiple partitions onto the same mountpoint!
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Need Real Name <sahai>
Component: gnome-mountAssignee: David Zeuthen <davidz>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact:
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 5CC: davidz, guichaz, mclasen, sahai, triage
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard: bzcl34nup
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2008-05-06 15:48:14 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Need Real Name 2006-04-18 15:49:33 UTC
Description of problem: 
Upon insertion of a USB drive with multiple partitions on it, they get
automounted in a strange way. Sometimes they each get their own
/media/disk-[1234] mount points, but at other times, multiple partitions get
mounted onto the same mount points simultaneously. (I didn't even know that was
possible) This did not used to happen in FC4. 

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:

Unpredictable, but usually happens.


Steps to Reproduce:
1. Insert USB disk with multiple partitions
2. Wait, then df.

  
Actual results:

/dev/sdf5             15440144  13159288   1496536  90% /media/disk
/dev/sdf6             15440144  13159288   1496536  90% /media/disk
/dev/sdf3             20158372  18556400    577972  97% /media/disk-1
/dev/sdf2             20158372  17791948   1342424  93% /media/disk-2


Expected results:

Each partition in its own mount point.

Comment 1 John (J5) Palmieri 2006-04-19 14:59:04 UTC
Mounting over another partition is a feature of the Linux kernel which allows
for things like adding diskspace without repartitioning.

However HAL should not be doing this.  David, do you have any insight to why
this still happens?  Looks like a race condition to me.

Comment 2 Bug Zapper 2008-04-04 02:40:04 UTC
Fedora apologizes that these issues have not been resolved yet. We're
sorry it's taken so long for your bug to be properly triaged and acted
on. We appreciate the time you took to report this issue and want to
make sure no important bugs slip through the cracks.

If you're currently running a version of Fedora Core between 1 and 6,
please note that Fedora no longer maintains these releases. We strongly
encourage you to upgrade to a current Fedora release. In order to
refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs
for releases which are no longer maintained and closing them.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LifeCycle/EOL

If this bug is still open against Fedora Core 1 through 6, thirty days
from now, it will be closed 'WONTFIX'. If you can reporduce this bug in
the latest Fedora version, please change to the respective version. If
you are unable to do this, please add a comment to this bug requesting
the change.

Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled
these issues to this point.

The process we are following is outlined here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp

We will be following the process here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this
doesn't happen again.

And if you'd like to join the bug triage team to help make things
better, check out http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers

Comment 3 Bug Zapper 2008-05-06 15:48:12 UTC
This bug is open for a Fedora version that is no longer maintained and
will not be fixed by Fedora. Therefore we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen thus bug against that version.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.