Bug 189316

Summary: RFE: Allow degraded (one-way) RAID1 installs
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 Reporter: Gordon Rowell <bugzilla>
Component: anacondaAssignee: Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.0CC: bugzilla.redhat, hpa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.contribs.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1277
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-04-19 15:21:10 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Allow degraded RAID1 installs none

Description Gordon Rowell 2006-04-19 02:17:19 UTC
This is an SME Server patch, pushed upstream for consideration.

We always install on RAID1, even with a single disk. This allows a smooth
transition to a mirrored configuration at a later stage.

The attached patch makes this a valid configuration and starts the RAID device
in degraded mode.

Comment 1 Gordon Rowell 2006-04-19 02:17:19 UTC
Created attachment 127965 [details]
Allow degraded RAID1 installs

Comment 2 Jeremy Katz 2006-04-19 15:21:10 UTC
We intentionally do not support degraded installs because they give a false
sense of redundancy to a user who is unaware that what they're doing is creating
a degraded array.

Comment 3 Gordon Rowell 2006-04-19 21:57:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> We intentionally do not support degraded installs because they give a false
> sense of redundancy to a user who is unaware that what they're doing is creating
> a degraded array.

Understood. Thanks.

Comment 4 Marc Bejarano 2006-08-10 19:56:37 UTC
it sounds like the purported problem is a user education one.  good
documentation and perhaps some UI work is the solution.  this would be quite a
useful feature.

Comment 5 Martin Sivák 2012-05-29 10:56:49 UTC
*** Bug 825867 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jesse Keating 2012-05-29 18:18:22 UTC
*** Bug 825866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Marc Bejarano 2012-05-30 16:52:27 UTC
hi jeremy.

care to comment on my comment 4 above?

tia