Bug 1893696

Summary: [8.4] [RFE] Release Ansible role for sshd in rhel-system-roles
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Pavel Cahyna <pcahyna>
Component: rhel-system-rolesAssignee: Pavel Cahyna <pcahyna>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Stanislav Zidek <szidek>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact: Eliane Ramos Pereira <elpereir>
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.3CC: djez, jafiala, jjelen, rmeggins, szidek
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: 8.4Flags: pcahyna: mirror+
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard: role:sshd
Fixed In Version: rhel-system-roles-1.0-23.el8 Doc Type: Enhancement
Doc Text:
.Support for SSHD RHEL System Role Previously, there was no vendor-supported automation tooling to configure SSH RHEL System Roles in a consistent and stable manner for servers and clients. With this enhancement, you can use the RHEL System Roles to configure `sshd` servers in a systematic and unified way regardless of operating system version.
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 16:02:26 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1894575    

Description Pavel Cahyna 2020-11-02 11:44:15 UTC

Comment 5 Jakub Jelen 2021-01-08 10:31:47 UTC
The commit in rhel-8.4.0 will probably not work as expected:

https://src.osci.redhat.com/rpms/rhel-system-roles/c/fcac5508b4a42f5e19d7d5ca64f1bf31f621e578?branch=rhel-8.4.0

As the role comes from different organization, we need to replace its old name in the tests and readme with the FQDN one of our organization. Otherwise they will fail. This was suggested before in the following PR:

https://src.osci.redhat.com/rpms/rhel-system-roles/pull-request/22/#_2__42

It also misses the README.md in the files section.

Now, I remembered that we also promised documentation to ship example playbook. I saw that there were several example playbooks in the rpm already. As we will have to change things anyway, it would be good to add it too. Bt as the PR is not yet merged upstream, we will probably have to take it separately from here (replacing the role name with FQDN again):

https://github.com/willshersystems/ansible-sshd/pull/150/files

See the following chunk for the expected name of the example playbook:

https://src.osci.redhat.com/rpms/rhel-system-roles/pull-request/22/#_2__96

Comment 17 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 16:02:26 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (rhel-system-roles bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2021:1909