Bug 189457
Summary: | MIxed x86_64/i386 update issues | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Danny Ciarniello <danny> |
Component: | yum | Assignee: | Jeremy Katz <katzj> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 5 | CC: | katzj |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-04-20 15:28:28 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Danny Ciarniello
2006-04-20 05:46:36 UTC
Where did you install libgnome.i386 from? It doesn't seem to be in the main x86_64 tree from my quick look. I originally installed libgnome.i386 by downloading the rpm from the main i386 tree (I need libgnome.i386 for firefox.i386) and installed it using rpm. I have since re-installed with yum after creating a repo file for the i386 tree. The installation can also be done using yumex by setting the "Force i386 architecture" on the Repos page. Note that the comments above also apply to librsvg2.i386 (the error is similar to the example I gave for libgnome). If you pull packages out of the i386 repo, you're also going to need to enable the i386 updates repository. Thanks, that worked. It should have been obvious that this was the solution but for some reason it wasn't. Maybe an explicit comment in the Multiarch section of the Release Notes would be a good idea. Hmmm... I've just taken a look at the x86_64 tree (both core and updates) and noticed that some packages (e.g. arts and avahi) have both x86_64 and i386 versions in the x86_64 tree while others (namely libgnome) do not. This apparent inconsistency makes things somewhat confusing. |