Bug 189568
Summary: | Specifying -n tcp to fuser results in extraneous here:xx output | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Steve Bergman <sbergman> | ||||
Component: | psmisc | Assignee: | Karel Zak <kzak> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 4.0 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-05 19:49:22 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Steve Bergman
2006-04-21 04:54:56 UTC
Created attachment 128074 [details]
Patch to remove what looks like left over debugging code
The component this request has been filed against is not planned for inclusion in the next update. The decision is based on weighting the priority and number of requests for a component as well as the impact on the Red Hat Enterprise Linux user-base: other components are considered having higher priority and the number of changes we intend to include in update cycles is limited. Product Management has reviewed and declined this request. You may appeal this decision by reopening this request. In my opinion, this is a *clear* bug to which a *trivial* patch has been submitted to fix. This is confusing to admins who are expecting either a group of numbers or nothing... and what they get is something like "here:22". It also affects scripts that expect correct output from fuser. This really should be fixed and the fix is trivial. Thank you for your (re)consideration. BTW, Bugzilla will not allow me to "appeal this decision by reopening this request" for some reason. It says I'm not the owner. |