Bug 1897961

Summary: Review Request: R-conflicted - An Alternative Conflict Resolution Strategy
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Elliott Sales de Andrade <quantum.analyst>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: José Matos <jamatos>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rawhideCC: jamatos, package-review
Target Milestone: ---Flags: jamatos: fedora-review+
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-12-15 01:21:04 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Elliott Sales de Andrade 2020-11-15 23:20:31 UTC
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-conflicted/R-conflicted.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/reviews/R-conflicted/R-conflicted-1.0.4-1.fc32.src.rpm

Description:
R's default conflict management system gives the most recently loaded
package precedence. This can make it hard to detect conflicts, particularly
when they arise because a package update creates ambiguity that did not
previously exist. 'conflicted' takes a different approach, making every
conflict an error and forcing you to choose which function to use.

Comment 1 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2020-11-15 23:21:53 UTC
koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55654226

Comment 2 José Matos 2020-12-03 00:12:52 UTC
The license is correct and appropriated for Fedora. 
The spec file follows the Fedora package guidelines.

In this case fedora-review does not complains, instead throws an exceptions while analyzing the rpm packages. :-)
This is already reported to fedora-review in another entry.

The package is thus approved.

Comment 3 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2020-12-03 23:59:28 UTC
Thank you for the review,José Matos

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/31169

Comment 4 Gwyn Ciesla 2020-12-04 15:17:37 UTC
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-conflicted

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2020-12-06 09:32:37 UTC
FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2020-12-06 09:32:37 UTC
FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2020-12-07 17:17:41 UTC
FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2020-12-07 17:34:32 UTC
FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.

Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2020-12-15 01:21:04 UTC
FEDORA-2020-d36f78f45f has been pushed to the Fedora 33 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 10 Fedora Update System 2020-12-15 01:40:39 UTC
FEDORA-2020-a2186e98bf has been pushed to the Fedora 32 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.