Bug 1898669
Summary: | [sig-builds][Feature:Builds] Multi-stage image builds should succeed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Hongkai Liu <hongkliu> |
Component: | Build | Assignee: | Gabe Montero <gmontero> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | XiuJuan Wang <xiuwang> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 4.5 | CC: | aos-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 4.7.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: |
[sig-builds][Feature:Builds] Multi-stage image builds should succeed
|
|
Last Closed: | 2020-11-17 21:09:53 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Hongkai Liu
2020-11-17 19:05:58 UTC
Seeing DockerHub-related rate limit throttling: [sig-builds][Feature:Builds] prune builds based on settings in the buildconfig should prune completed builds based on the successfulBuildsHistoryLimit setting [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] 2020-11-17T18:05:02.641436603Z error: build error: failed to pull image: After retrying 2 times, Pull image still failed due to error: while pulling "docker://busybox" as "busybox": Error initializing source docker://busybox:latest: Error reading manifest latest in docker.io/library/busybox: toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading: https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit [sig-builds][Feature:Builds] Optimized image builds should succeed [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] error: build error: failed to pull image: After retrying 2 times, Pull image still failed due to error: while pulling "docker://centos:7" as "centos:7": Error initializing source docker://centos:7: Error reading manifest 7 in docker.io/library/centos: toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading: https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit [sig-builds][Feature:Builds] build can reference a cluster service with a build being created from new-build should be able to run a build that references a cluster service [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] expand_less container image registry lookup failed: docker.io/openshift/hello-openshift:latest: toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading: https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit [sig-builds][Feature:Builds][valueFrom] process valueFrom in build strategy environment variables should successfully resolve valueFrom in docker build environment variables [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] [sig-builds][Feature:Builds] custom build with buildah being created from new-build should complete build with custom builder image [Suite:openshift/conformance/parallel] error creating build container: Error initializing source docker://centos:7: Error reading manifest 7 in docker.io/library/centos: toomanyrequests: You have reached your pull rate limit. You may increase the limit by authenticating and upgrading: https://www.docker.com/increase-rate-limit Clayton wants to solve this with the work he is doing with https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1816812 And in fact if you look at the associated PR https://github.com/openshift/origin/pull/24887 and its test history https://prow.ci.openshift.org/pr-history?org=openshift&repo=origin&pr=24887 e2e-*-builds has passes when k8s level flakes have not intervened. For good measure, there is also the defect https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1895107 which also covers this docker.io throttling. In a sense it is serving as the backup for 1816812. I'm closing this one as a dupe as I am already monitoring / involved in these other 2 bz's. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1816812 *** |