Bug 1902710

Summary: [OSP] Fails to attach cinder volume using virtio-scsi and in-tree cinder provisioned
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Martin André <m.andre>
Component: InstallerAssignee: Martin André <m.andre>
Installer sub component: OpenShift on OpenStack QA Contact: weiwei jiang <wjiang>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE Docs Contact:
Severity: high    
Priority: unspecified CC: wduan
Version: 4.7   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.7.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-12-01 13:29:36 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Martin André 2020-11-30 13:21:14 UTC 
With newer versions of OpenStack/libvirt, the path of the attached block storage volume now contains the full volume ID when using virtio-scsi.

The problem is described in the upstream OpenStack cloud provider repository on github [1] and k8s/community [2] and was fixed already for the external cloud provider [3]. However, the fix was never merged for the in-tree cloud provider [4].

Without this change, the Cinder PVC times out attaching the storage to the node when using virtio-scsi and the in-tree cinder provisioned on OSP16.

Kubelet logs show:
Nov 30 12:38:35 mandre-psi-pub-stlh7-worker-0-b4xhh hyperkube[1868]: W1130 12:38:35.640309    1868 openstack_volumes.go:576] Failed to find device for the volumeID: "bcc21b3e-23fa-4464-844c-62506e298744"
Nov 30 12:38:35 mandre-psi-pub-stlh7-worker-0-b4xhh hyperkube[1868]: E1130 12:38:35.640319    1868 attacher.go:249] Error: could not find attached Cinder disk "bcc21b3e-23fa-4464-844c-62506e298744" (path: ""): <nil>

[1] https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/issues/852
[2] https://github.com/kubernetes/community/issues/4797
[2] https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/pull/853
[3] https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/89726
Comment 1 Martin André 2020-12-01 13:29:36 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1897603 ***