Bug 190316

Summary:	Review Request: perl-Email-MIME-Modifier - Modify Email::MIME Objects Easily
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Jason Tibbitts <j>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2006-05-04 12:15:49 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	190315
Bug Blocks:	163779, 190318

Description Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-05-01 01:05:59 UTC

Spec URL:
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Modifier.spec

SRPM URL:
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-1.82-2.src.rpm

Description:
Provides a number of useful methods for manipulating MIME messages.
These method are declared in the "Email::MIME" namespace, and are used
with "Email::MIME" objects.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-05-02 00:00:37 UTC

Oops, wrong SRPM link.  I'm going to assume you meant 
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Email-MIME-Modifier-1.42-2.src.rpm

Review:
* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written, uses macros consistently and
follows the Perl specfile template.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.  It's not included separately in the
package, but this is not necessary as the upstream tarball does not include it.
* source files match upstream:
   3acf1c19da93334be37f3f9a288acd91  Email-MIME-Modifier-1.42.tar.gz
   3acf1c19da93334be37f3f9a288acd91  Email-MIME-Modifier-1.42.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=5, Tests=68,  0 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr +  0.06 csys =  0.28 CPU)
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

Comment 2 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-05-04 12:15:49 UTC

Thanks for the review.

Imported and built for FC-4, FC-5, and devel.