Bug 1903813

Summary: [RFE] Ship preconfigured /etc/containers/registries.d/ files with containers-common
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Derrick Ornelas <dornelas>
Component: skopeoAssignee: Jindrich Novy <jnovy>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Yuhui Jiang <yujiang>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.3CC: dornelas, jnovy, mitr, pamoedom, pthomas, smccarty, tsweeney, umohnani, ypu, yujiang
Target Milestone: rcKeywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Target Release: 8.0   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: skopeo-1.2.1-3.el8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 15:32:56 UTC Type: Enhancement
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1186913, 1823899    

Comment 2 Miloslav Trmač 2020-12-04 16:56:15 UTC
Thanks for the suggestion, this does make sense. (For the record, a theoretical downside is that if the sigstore is down, pulling images would fail as well. But at least for registry.redhat.io it’s literally the same host name, so that seems very unlikely.)

Jindřich, what’s the best way to do this? Just include the files in the RPM packaging, or is there an upstream repo where this would make sense to ship? (I’m a bit reluctant to maintain a “public registry” on GitHub, although it’s much less of a concern than a registry of trusted public keys.)

Comment 3 Jindrich Novy 2020-12-07 09:31:05 UTC
Yes, this makes sense to ship within containers-common package IMO.

With shortnames and now signature verification data in containers-common I think it makes sense to completely decouple containers-common from skopeo as it was never really related to skopeo only.

Mirek/Derrick - is this aimed at 8.3.1 or 8.4.0?

Comment 13 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 15:32:56 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (Moderate: container-tools:rhel8 security, bug fix, and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1796

Comment 14 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 00:52:18 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days