Bug 1904045

Summary: sos preset ignores verbosity
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Miroslav Hradílek <mhradile>
Component: sosAssignee: Pavel Moravec <pmoravec>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Miroslav Hradílek <mhradile>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 8.4CC: agk, bmr, plambri, sbradley
Target Milestone: rcFlags: pm-rhel: mirror+
Target Release: 8.4   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: sos-4.0-3.el8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-18 14:49:10 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Miroslav Hradílek 2020-12-03 12:23:51 UTC
Description of problem:
Preset does not reflect verbosity in sos 4.0.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
sos-4.0-2.el8.noarch (unreleased)

How reproducible:
100%

Steps to Reproduce:
1. sos report --add-preset sostestpreset -vvv -o host
2. sos report --preset sostestpreset --batch

Actual results:
Only host plugin is collected but output is not verbose.

Expected results:
Only host plugin should be collected and output should be very verbose. For example showing effective options, collected files etc.


Additional info:
This worked in 3.9.

Comment 1 Pavel Moravec 2020-12-03 14:34:20 UTC
Already fixed in upstream via https://github.com/sosreport/sos/pull/2304 - manually backporting the PR, the reproducer scenario is fixed.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2021-05-18 14:49:10 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (sos bug fix and enhancement update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2021:1604