Bug 190466
Summary: | HWCERT: CPC5564 B1P2M2H0 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Retired] Red Hat Ready Certification Tests | Reporter: | Jude Michael Moersdorf <jude.moersdorf> |
Component: | dumpster | Assignee: | Rob Landry <rlandry> |
Status: | CLOSED DEFERRED | QA Contact: | Red Hat Hardware Certification <hwcert-reviewers> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 1.0 | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.pt.com/products/prod_CPC5564.html | ||
Whiteboard: | CPC5564 | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-09-06 18:54:14 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Jude Michael Moersdorf
2006-05-02 17:30:01 UTC
I have tried using the "Add Additional Certification Package" section to upload the run for the 32-bit (i386) SMP kernel. I get a system error message. Is this the proper place to upload my second test case? New Hardware Certification Package Submitted Kernel Version: kernel-smp-2.6.9-34.EL File Uploaded: rhr2-B1P2M2H0-Nahant_Update_3_results-2.noarch.rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/hwcert/data/rpms/e78bb152051123a36d47d35d794f091a/rhr2-B1P2M2H0-Nahant_Update_3_results-2.noarch.rpm 0 PASSED USB PASSED INFO 1 PASSED INFO PASSED VIDEO PASSED STORAGE PASSED NETWORK PASSED CORE We are in the process of validating another product, the CPC5564. This one has been assigned to Rob Landry. Does it make sense to have both boards assigned to Rob? It would be easier on us to send one cPCI chassis in with both boards for the validation. Jude, Presuming the altered URL is accurate; it appears in order to post we'll need results for the MEMORY test, USB with the 2x backplane ports (total 3), and backplane EIDE results both x86 and x86_64. Let me know if this doesn't seem right, I think this aligns to our discussion in 189788. -Rob I'm also going to close this one out; again we can open it if we need to revisit. Seems vendor will not update, set to be dumpest. |