Bug 190949 (gaim-gaym)

Summary: Review Request: gaim-gaym
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Chris Weyl <cweyl>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Thorsten Leemhuis (ignored mailbox) <bugzilla-sink>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: noa
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-05-18 16:49:08 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Chris Weyl 2006-05-07 02:00:27 UTC
Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym-0.96-1.fc5.src.rpm
Description: 

This package provides a protocol plugin for the popular instant messaging
program, gaim.  If you want to be able to chat on gay.com via gaim, install
this package.

Comment 1 Noa Resare 2006-05-08 10:34:01 UTC
The src.rpm gives a 404

Just a quick note on the .spec file. The Requires: gtk2 is probably redundant.
rpmbuild will normally find out the correct library dependencies automagically



Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2006-05-08 16:25:29 UTC
Apologies -- had pushed rel 0 rather than rel 1 of the srpm :\

Spec tweaked, explicit requires: gtk2 dropped.

Spec URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym.spec
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/gaim-gaym-0.96-2.fc5.src.rpm

Comment 3 Noa Resare 2006-05-08 18:09:19 UTC
Although I'm not an officially blessed reviewer I thought that I can do a test
review and learn somewhat from it.

good:
- rpmlint without any complaints
- although the upstream tarball is named qrc the user community uses the name
gaym, so I think changing the name is a good call even though it violates the
first sentence of the package naming guidelines
- specfile name matches %{name}
- license is indeed GPL
- COPYING is included in %doc
- to the best of my knowledge the spec is written in american english
- the specfile is quite readable
- tarball referenced maches the tarball included
- the package builds correctly and seems to work quite well on fc5/i386, it also
builds on fc4/x86_64 but I haven't actually tested it there
- no localization, no shared libraries, not relocateable, no scriptlets
- no duplicates in %files
- it contains a GUI but since it is embedded in gaim the .desktop MUST is not
applicable
- no scriptlets

As far as my newbies eyes can tell this package is problem free and works as
expected.

Comment 4 Noa Resare 2006-05-16 15:03:58 UTC
With my newly recieved blessing powers I'd like to exclaim +1 Publish!

I have also tested build on fc5/x86_64 and it works as expected