Bug 1909950
| Summary: | ghostscript v9.53.3 opvp is still disable | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | tess <yujiyan_1> |
| Component: | ghostscript | Assignee: | Anna Khaitovich <akhaitov> |
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 32 | CC: | akhaitov, deekej, mjg, mosvald, zdohnal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2021-01-14 11:56:00 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
tess
2020-12-22 07:13:00 UTC
Over in the original bug 1899885 the OP reported "works for me" for the test build from the same source. Are you sure opvp is not there, or is it just not listed because it is deprecated? I builded the code with the patch, it works for me. But the newest rpm package in the fedora32 source doesn’t work for me. Also I tested the canon driver. Please confirm the configure script file is correct or not. With the ghostscript-9.53.3-restore-opvp-device.patch, the configure script file should be updated. But the configure script file in the gostscript-9.53.3-3.fc32.src.rpm and gostscript-9.53.3-1.fc32.src.rpm are same. Please confirm again. This is somehow backwards. How did you build the code? From a git checkout, from a release tarball or from the source rpm? How did you test the canon driver? As I said, over in bug 1899885 the original reporter confirmed that the bug was solved for him, and it would have been easier to have the discussion there rather than opening a new bug. Fedora development is done in the open, there is nothing we could or should "confirm" - and you already looked at the source, apparantly. Upcoming scratch builds with a patched configure after autogen.sh rerun: F34: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026171 F33: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026277 F32: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026425 Thanks for the rerun autogen.sh. I will test it tomorrow. I builded the code from source rpm. And it’s easy to test the canon driver: print and get the spooler file. And I don’t know the bug 1899885 before I report this one :) [Test Distribution]: Fedora 32 & Fedora 33 [Test Steps]: 1. Download ghostscript-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm & libgs-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm from above links. 2. Install libgs-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm & ghostscript-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm by using command "rpm -i --force" [Test Result]: OK After inputting the command "devicenames ==", the opvp is included in the device names. And the Canon driver prints OK. When can I update the ghostcript from the fedora source? PS: I come from here: https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=703262 Hi, (In reply to Michael J Gruber from comment #4) > This is somehow backwards. > > How did you build the code? From a git checkout, from a release tarball or > from the source rpm? How did you test the canon driver? > > As I said, over in bug 1899885 the original reporter confirmed that the bug > was solved for him, and it would have been easier to have the discussion > there rather than opening a new bug. > > Fedora development is done in the open, there is nothing we could or should > "confirm" - and you already looked at the source, apparantly. > > Upcoming scratch builds with a patched configure after autogen.sh rerun: > > F34: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026171 > > F33: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026277 > > F32: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=58026425 When will the Ghostscript be updated to the Version 9.53.4-4 in the Fedora Repository? (In reply to tess from comment #7) > When will the Ghostscript be updated to the Version 9.53.4-4 in the Fedora > Repository? Sorry for written mistake, When will the Ghostscript be updated to the Version 9.53.3-4 in the Fedora Repository? I have created pull requests now. The thing is that we had a positive report without this fix already, and now one negative report without it and one positive report with it. That's not much. But should be OK. Note also that I'm not a ghostscript maintainer. I maintain a library which gs depends on, and I have commit rights for gs only to submit coordinated rebuilds of gs and other packages when the library (jbig2dec) changes. So, while technically I could do the update I don't feel entitled to. Thanks, Michael! I am waiting :) Hi, there is an update including this fix - https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-644648d619 Could you please confirm if its working for you? Thanks in advance It works for me. <Test Case1> ----------------- [Architecture]: Fedora32 +x86_64 [Steps]: 1. Download ghostscript-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm & libgs-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm from the link https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-644648d619. 2. Install libgs-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm & ghostscript-9.53.3-4.fc32.x86_64.rpm by using command "rpm -i --force" [Result]: OK After inputting the command "devicenames ==", the opvp is included in the device names. And the Canon driver prints OK. <Test Case2> ----------------- [Architecture]: Fedora33 + aarch64 [Steps]: 1. Download ghostscript-9.53.3-4.fc32.aarch64.rpm & libgs-9.53.3-4.fc32.aarch64.rpm from the link https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-644648d619. 2. Install libgs-9.53.3-4.fc32.aarch64.rpm & ghostscript-9.53.3-4.fc32.aarch64.rpm by using command "rpm -i --force" [Result]: OK After inputting the command "devicenames ==", the opvp is included in the device names. But Canon has no aarch64 driver to be tested. |