Bug 1914713

Summary:	Unable to view config reports for some hosts when an admin user has assigned any role with limit filter
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Hao Chang Yu <hyu>
Component:	Reporting	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	Lukáš Hellebrandt <lhellebr>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.8.0	CC:	arahaman, mhulan, satellite6-bugs
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2022-10-28 18:02:59 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Hao Chang Yu 2021-01-11 00:54:30 UTC

Description of problem:
If an admin user have multiple roles that are assigned through one or more usergroups (mapped with LDAP groups) and any of the assigned roles has limit filter, then the admin user is unable to see the config reports of some hosts not matching the limit filter.

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Create a role, e.g. "my_role".
2. Create a filter for "my_role" and add "view_hosts" permission to it.
3. Limit the filter to "name != host1.example.com"
4. Create a usergroup, e.g. "my_usergroup"
5. Assign an admin user to "my_usergroup" and assign "my_role" to my_usergroup
6. Login as the admin user
7. Go to the Web UI -> Monitor -> Config Management -> Filter "host = host1.example.com"


Actual results:
host1.example.com is not found

Expected results:
host1.example.com should be shown regardless of the limit filter because the user is an admin user.

Comment 4 Brad Buckingham 2022-09-02 20:25:18 UTC

Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team.  Thank you.

Comment 5 Brad Buckingham 2022-09-02 20:31:56 UTC

Upon review of our valid but aging backlog the Satellite Team has concluded that this Bugzilla does not meet the criteria for a resolution in the near term, and are planning to close in a month. This message may be a repeat of a previous update and the bug is again being considered to be closed. If you have any concerns about this, please contact your Red Hat Account team.  Thank you.

Comment 6 Brad Buckingham 2022-10-28 18:02:59 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Red Hat Satellite. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this feel free to contact your Red Hat Account Team. Thank you.

Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-18 00:24:07 UTC

The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 120 days