Bug 1916007

Summary: olm skip range is set to the wrong range
Product: OpenShift Container Platform Reporter: Carlos Eduardo Arango Gutierrez <carangog>
Component: Node Feature Discovery OperatorAssignee: Robin Cernin <rcernin>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Walid A. <wabouham>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 4.6.zCC: rcernin, sejug
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: 4.6.z   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-03-09 20:00:46 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 1916010    
Bug Blocks:    

Comment 2 Robin Cernin 2021-01-19 01:38:45 UTC
Hello Carlos,

It is a valid bug. My understanding is this wouldn't upgrade to 4.1.0-> to 4.7.0, meaning it would miss upgrade in 4.6.z

We saw same issue https://github.com/openshift/cluster-nfd-operator/pull/124/files and the issue comes from mis-understanding of olm.skipRange. 

I can see it's quite simple and has been assigned for a while without PR, hope you don't mind helping you :) 

Created https://github.com/openshift/cluster-nfd-operator/pull/127

Comment 5 Walid A. 2021-03-03 17:34:47 UTC
Verified that https://github.com/openshift/cluster-nfd-operator/blob/release-4.6/manifests/olm-catalog/4.6/nfd.v4.6.0.clusterserviceversion.yaml#L34  now point to version 4.6:

    olm.skipRange: ">=4.3.0 <4.6.0"

Comment 7 errata-xmlrpc 2021-03-09 20:00:46 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory (OpenShift Container Platform 4.6.20 extras update), and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2021:0675