Bug 191620

Summary: Review Request: perl-PPI-HTML - Generate syntax-hightlighted HTML for Perl using PPI
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Jason Tibbitts <j>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-05-15 23:44:37 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On: 191619    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-05-13 23:11:57 UTC
Spec URL: 
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PPI-HTML.spec

SRPM URL:
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-PPI-HTML-1.07-1.src.rpm

Description:
PPI::HTML converts Perl documents into syntax highlighted HTML pages.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-05-15 16:28:47 UTC
Not much to say:

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible; license text is included in the package.
* source files match upstream:
   c2858d87c0e12ab87845606957bcd122  PPI-HTML-1.07.tar.gz
   c2858d87c0e12ab87845606957bcd122  PPI-HTML-1.07.tar.gz-srpm
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* %check is present and all tests pass:
   All tests successful.
   Files=3, Tests=19,  1 wallclock secs ( 0.22 cusr +  0.08 csys =  0.30 CPU)
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

APPROVED

Comment 2 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2006-05-15 23:44:37 UTC
Thanks for the review.

Imported and built for FC-5 and devel.